Contradiction with Genesis 3:16
It contrasts the role reversal implied in Jeremiah 31:22, emphasising traditional gender roles with a focus on woman's desire towards her husband and his rule over her.
Genesis 3:16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. [to thy...: or, subject to thy husband]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 11:3
This verse establishes a hierarchical order – God, Christ, man, woman – that could contradict the "new thing" in relationships mentioned in Jeremiah 31:22.
1 Corinthians 11:3: But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:22-24
It instructs wives to submit to their husbands, potentially conflicting with the notion of a woman encompassing a man, suggesting a shift in dynamics.
Ephesians 5:22-24: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:12
Prohibits women from assuming authority over men, which may contrast with the empowerment or new role of women alluded to in Jeremiah 31:22.
1 Timothy 2:12: But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:1
Advises wives to be in subjection to their own husbands, countering the suggestion of a different relational dynamic in Jeremiah 31:22.
1 Peter 3:1: Likewise, ye wives, [be] in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction or conflict related to Jeremiah 31:22 might involve differing interpretations of gender roles and expectations. Some interpretations could see the verse as contradicting traditional views of male leadership by suggesting a reversal or change in expected roles. This could lead to debates about the consistency of gender roles across different parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
The verse is often seen as mysterious, and interpretations vary. Some find a potential contradiction in traditional gender roles as expressed elsewhere in the Bible. In this verse, a woman is said to do something unexpected or unconventional, which could challenge typical interpretations of gender dynamics in biblical context. However, since meanings can be deeply symbolic or prophetic, this may not constitute a direct contradiction but rather an invitation to explore diverse interpretations.
Paradox #3
Some interpretations of Jeremiah 31:22 focus on the phrase suggesting a "woman will surround a man," which has been perplexing or unclear to scholars and believers. The historical context and meaning of this phrase have been debated. Some see it as symbolic, while others try to link it to specific historical events or cultural practices, but there is no clear consensus. This leads to differing interpretations and inconsistent understandings of the verse.