Contradictions and Paradoxes in Jeremiah 31:32

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Jeremiah 31:32 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Jeremiah 31:32. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Jeremiah, God is saying that He is going to make a new special promise with His people, different from the one He made a long time ago when He led them out of Egypt. Even though they didn't keep the first promise, God still cares for them very much like a loving parent.

Jeremiah 31:32: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day [that] I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: [although...: or, should I have continued an husband unto them?]

Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13

This verse mentions that by calling the new covenant "new," God has made the first one obsolete, suggesting that the former covenant is no longer valid, contrary to Jeremiah 31:32, which implies continuity of covenants.

Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.

Contradiction with Exodus 19:5

This verse indicates that if Israel obeys, they will be a special treasure to God, implying a conditional covenant, while Jeremiah 31:32 suggests the new covenant will be unconditional and not based on Israel's failure to uphold the old covenant.

Exodus 19:5: Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth [is] mine:

Paradox #1

It could be seen as conflicting with the idea that God's covenant with Israel is eternal and unchanging, since this verse speaks of a new covenant different from the one made with their ancestors.

Paradox #2

Jeremiah 31:32 might be seen as conflicting with earlier understandings of the covenant between God and Israel. It suggests a change from the covenant made during the time of the Exodus, indicating a new or different relationship. This could seem inconsistent with the idea of an unchanging covenant.

Paradox #3

This verse might seem inconsistent because it suggests a difference between the new covenant and the old covenant given to the ancestors when they were brought out of Egypt. Some readers might find it contradictory because they wonder why God would need to establish a new agreement if the old one was perfect or divinely given. However, others interpret this as a continuous development in God's relationship with people.

Paradox #4

The potential contradiction in Jeremiah 31:32 could stem from the idea of God breaking a past agreement with the people, despite being viewed as unchanging and faithful. This perceived inconsistency might challenge the belief in an unwavering divine nature.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.