Contradiction with 2 Kings 3:27
This verse describes a king sacrificing his son as a burnt offering, and it brought a great wrath against Israel, which implies that such acts can have powerful effects, conflicting with God's disapproval of such actions in Jeremiah 32:35.
2 Kings 3:27: Then he took his eldest son that should have reigned in his stead, and offered him [for] a burnt offering upon the wall. And there was great indignation against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned to [their own] land.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 20:25-26
These verses suggest that God gave laws that were not good, by which He defiled them through their sacrifices of the firstborn, implicitly presenting a contradiction to God's denunciation of child sacrifice in Jeremiah 32:35.
Ezekiel 20:25-26: Wherefore I gave them also statutes [that were] not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
Contradiction with Judges 11:30-39
Jephthah vows to the Lord to offer a burnt offering of whatever comes out of his house, which turns out to be his daughter, contradicting the denouncement of human sacrifice found in Jeremiah 32:35.
Judges 11:30-39: And Jephthah vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into mine hands,
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 32:35 highlights a contradiction because it mentions people practicing child sacrifice, which God says He did not command nor did it enter His mind. However, elsewhere in the Bible, God is depicted as commanding harsh actions, including the destruction of entire groups of people. This raises questions about God's consistent nature and commands.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 32:35 might be seen as conflicting because it mentions practices that are strongly condemned elsewhere in the Bible. This could be viewed as inconsistent due to descriptions of certain actions in Israel's history that were against God's commands, highlighting the tension between human actions and divine expectations.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 32:35 mentions the practice of child sacrifice, which some parts of the Bible condemn, while others indicate it was a practice among Israelites at certain times. This creates an inconsistency because the Bible also highlights strict adherence to God's laws, which forbid such practices, yet it acknowledges that these actions occurred.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Jeremiah 32:35 may arise from the fact that it mentions God's disapproval of the Israelites practicing child sacrifice, which some might see as inconsistent considering other parts of the Old Testament where God commands or allows actions that can seem harsh or violent. This could lead to questions about the consistency of God's character in terms of mercy and justice.