Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While Jeremiah 51:6 encourages fleeing from a doomed city, Matthew 5:44 advocates loving enemies, suggesting a more forgiving approach.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
Jeremiah 51:6 advises leaving vengeance to God, whereas Romans 12:17-19 suggests doing good to enemies, which could be seen as a conflicting action.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
Jeremiah 51:6 calls for fleeing to avoid punishment, while Proverbs encourages caring for one's enemy, highlighting a contradiction in responding to opponents or threats.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:23
Peter illustrates enduring suffering and trusting God for justice, seemingly inconsistent with Jeremiah 51:6's directive to flee from impending danger.
1 Peter 2:23: Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed [himself] to him that judgeth righteously: [himself: or, his cause]
Paradox #1
The contradiction with Jeremiah 51:6 might arise when comparing the timeline and details of Babylon's fall in biblical accounts with historical and archaeological findings. The Bible presents a specific theological and prophetic perspective on events, while historical records provide different details and timelines, leading to some inconsistencies.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 51:6 calls for people to flee from Babylon to save themselves from its impending destruction. A contradiction or conflict could arise if seen as encouraging individuals to prioritize their own safety over collective responsibility or help for others who might not be able to flee. This might clash with values like altruism or communal solidarity.