Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:3
While Jeremiah 6:14 criticizes false peace proclamations, 1 Thessalonians 5:3 warns that destruction will come when people feel most secure.
1 Thessalonians 5:3: For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 13:10
Contradicts Jeremiah 6:14 by highlighting false prophets declaring peace when there is none, similar to the rebuke in Jeremiah but emphasizing the misleading intentions.
Ezekiel 13:10: Because, even because they have seduced my people, saying, Peace; and [there was] no peace; and one built up a wall, and, lo, others daubed it with untempered [morter]: [a wall: or, a slight wall]
Contradiction with Micah 3:5
While Jeremiah 6:14 criticizes assurances of peace without true healing, Micah 3:5 condemns prophets who promise peace in return for benefits.
Micah 3:5: Thus saith the LORD concerning the prophets that make my people err, that bite with their teeth, and cry, Peace; and he that putteth not into their mouths, they even prepare war against him.
Paradox #1
The verse talks about false peace and healing when there isn't any real resolution. Theologically, this could conflict with the idea that God's messages should always be truthful and that genuine peace comes from God. Claiming peace when there is none might suggest a failure to truly listen to or understand God's will.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 6:14 talks about false prophets who claim there is peace when there is actually no peace. A potential contradiction or conflict might arise when comparing this with messages in other parts of the Bible where God promises peace and restoration. Some may see inconsistency if they don't consider the context: the false prophets are giving a misleading message, while true divine peace comes from genuine repentance and alignment with God's will. Understanding the difference in context resolves the perceived contradiction.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 6:14 highlights the issue of offering superficial solutions to deep problems. The contradiction could be seen in the practice of addressing serious issues with insincere or inadequate responses, which can prevent real healing or understanding. This inconsistency lies in the difference between appearing to care and actually taking meaningful action to resolve problems.