Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:9
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 by highlighting actions (stealing, murdering, committing adultery, swearing falsely, burning incense to Baal, and walking after other gods) that lead to the presumption of being delivered while engaging in these abominations, as questioned in verse 10.
Jeremiah 7:9: Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not;
Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:11
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 by questioning whether God's house, called by His name, has become a den of robbers, contradicting the false security expressed in verse 10 of being delivered after wrongdoing.
Jeremiah 7:11: Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes? Behold, even I have seen [it], saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:15
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 by showing that God will hide His eyes from them and not hear their prayers due to their sins, contrary to the false assurance of deliverance they claim in Jeremiah 7:10.
Isaiah 1:15: And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. [make...: Heb. multiply prayer] [blood: Heb. bloods]
Contradiction with Micah 3:11
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 as it criticizes leaders who rely on the Lord while committing injustices, similar to the false assurance of deliverance while doing abominations as in Jeremiah 7:10.
Micah 3:11: The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon the LORD, and say, [Is] not the LORD among us? none evil can come upon us. [and say: Heb. saying]
Contradiction with Matthew 7:21-23
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 by emphasizing that not everyone who claims to know the Lord and believes they are delivered will enter the kingdom of heaven, focusing instead on doing the will of God.
Matthew 7:21-23: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Contradiction with Romans 6:1-2
It contradicts Jeremiah 7:10 by rejecting the idea that one can continue in sin with the expectation of grace or deliverance, contrary to the presumption of safety while sinning in verse 10.
Romans 6:1-2: What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Jeremiah 7:10 lies in the behavior of those who act hypocritically. They engage in sinful behavior but still feel secure in God's presence at the temple, believing they are delivered from judgment because of their religious rituals. This contradicts the biblical teaching that emphasizes genuine repentance and a sincere relationship with God over mere ritualistic practices.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 7:10 could be seen as conflicting with the idea that one can find safety or security in religious rituals alone, without sincere moral conduct. This verse suggests that some people might mistakenly believe that performing certain religious acts gives them a free pass to continue behaving wrongly. This could contradict the broader biblical teaching that true faith requires both belief and righteous living.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 7:10 could be seen as highlighting a contradiction regarding hypocrisy in worship. The verse suggests that people believe they can commit wrongdoings and still be protected simply by participating in religious rituals. This can be inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize genuine repentance and righteous living as prerequisites for divine favor and protection. This reflects a conflict between outward religious practices and true moral conduct.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Jeremiah 7:10 could be seen in the behavior of people who act wrongly and then assume everything is fine because they still visit a place of worship. It highlights the inconsistency of seeking forgiveness or safety without genuine repentance or change in behavior. Essentially, it points out the conflict between actions and beliefs.