Contradiction with Proverbs 12:21
While Jeremiah 8:5 discusses the perpetual backsliding of the people, Proverbs 12:21 states that no evil will happen to the just, implying a stability and protection not seen in the backsliders of Jeremiah.
Proverbs 12:21: There shall no evil happen to the just: but the wicked shall be filled with mischief.
Contradiction with Isaiah 57:18
Contradicting the imagery of perpetual backsliding, Isaiah 57:18 speaks of God seeing the people's ways and choosing to heal and guide them, offering a message of hope and restoration.
Isaiah 57:18: I have seen his ways, and will heal him: I will lead him also, and restore comforts unto him and to his mourners.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Jeremiah 8:5 features continual backsliding, while Ezekiel 18:32 highlights God’s desire for repentance and life, emphasizing a change away from perpetual rebellion.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with James 4:8
While Jeremiah 8:5 reflects a refusal to return to God, James 4:8 encourages coming closer to God with a promise of reciprocal closeness, suggesting an opportunity for reconciliation.
James 4:8: Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse [your] hands, [ye] sinners; and purify [your] hearts, [ye] double minded.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 7:14
Contrasting with the persistent backsliding in Jeremiah 8:5, 2 Chronicles 7:14 offers a conditional promise of healing if the people humble themselves and turn from their wicked ways.
2 Chronicles 7:14: If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. [which...: Heb. upon whom my name is called]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Jeremiah 8:5 lies in the way it highlights the persistent wrongdoing of people despite being guided. On one hand, it shows the expectation for people to follow a moral path; on the other hand, it acknowledges their repeated failures. The conflict may arise from questioning the fairness of continued punishment or blame if failure seems inevitable.