Contradiction with Romans 8:1
This verse states there is no condemnation for those in Christ, while Job 10:15 expresses feelings of shame and condemnation.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with 1 John 1:9
This verse assures that confession leads to forgiveness and cleansing, contradicting Job 10:15 where guilt and shame persist.
1 John 1:9: If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Contradiction with Psalm 32:1
It declares blessedness in forgiveness and covering of sin, contrasting with the enduring shame in Job 10:15.
Psalm 32:1: [[A Psalm] of David, Maschil.] Blessed [is he whose] transgression [is] forgiven, [whose] sin [is] covered. [A Psalm...: or, A Psalm of David giving instruction]
Contradiction with Isaiah 43:25
It emphasizes God's act of blotting out transgressions for His own sake, against the context of continual disgrace in Job 10:15.
Isaiah 43:25: I, [even] I, [am] he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins.
Contradiction with Psalm 103:12
This verse talks about God removing transgressions as far as the east is from the west, while Job 10:15 speaks about being overwhelmed by shame.
Psalm 103:12: As far as the east is from the west, [so] far hath he removed our transgressions from us.
Paradox #1
The verse in Job 10:15 reflects Job's feelings of condemnation and suffering, regardless of his innocence or guilt. A potential theological conflict here could be with the concept of divine justice. The Bible often portrays God as just and fair, rewarding the righteous and punishing the wicked. However, Job's suffering despite his faithfulness might seem inconsistent with this view of divine justice, raising questions about why the righteous suffer without apparent cause.
Paradox #2
Job 10:15 could present a contradiction in the sense that it reflects the feeling of being punished regardless of one's innocence or guilt. It raises the question of why a just and loving God would allow suffering to befall both the wicked and the righteous without distinction. This can be seen as inconsistent with the idea of a fair and just divine system.