Contradiction with Exodus 20:5
This verse states that God visits the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, contradicting Job 21:19, which questions this idea.
Exodus 20:5: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me;
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse emphasizes individual accountability for sin, contrasting with the idea in Job 21:19 of children being punished for their parents' sins.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Paradox #1
Job 21:19 suggests that the children of the wicked may suffer for their parents' sins. This seems to contradict the idea in other parts of the Bible, like Ezekiel 18:20, which says that everyone is responsible for their own sin and will not bear the sin of others. This creates a tension between individual responsibility and inherited consequences.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction with the idea in this verse is that it suggests the children of a wrongdoer can suffer consequences for the parent's actions. This seems inconsistent with other parts of the Bible, such as Ezekiel 18:20, which says individuals are responsible for their own actions and not punished for their parents' sins. This can create confusion about whether punishment for sin is individual or generational.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Job 21:19 lies in the differing views on generational punishment. In some parts of the Bible, it says that God punishes children for their parents' sins, but other parts emphasize individual responsibility. This creates a conflict in understanding how justice is applied across generations.
Paradox #4
Job 21:19 discusses the idea that God punishes children for the sins of their parents, which can seem morally contradictory. The conflict arises because it might seem unfair to hold children accountable for something they didn't do themselves. In many ethical perspectives, it's considered just for individuals to be responsible for their own actions, rather than suffering for the wrongs of others.