Contradiction with Proverbs 19:17
This verse suggests that showing kindness to the poor is like lending to the Lord, implying that God rewards those who are generous to the needy, in contrast to Job 22:6 which accuses Job of being unkind by taking pledges from his brethren.
Proverbs 19:17: He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the LORD; and that which he hath given will he pay him again. [that which...: or, his deed]
Contradiction with James 2:15-16
These verses encourage providing for those in need, directly opposing the accusation in Job 22:6 of withholding clothing from the naked by taking pledges.
James 2:15-16: If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:42
This verse instructs to give to those who ask, and not turn away, which is contrary to the implication in Job 22:6 of not supporting the needy willingly.
Matthew 5:42: Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Contradiction with Luke 12:33
Jesus advises selling possessions to give alms, advocating for generosity, which contrasts with the accusation that Job exploited others financially by demanding pledges.
Luke 12:33: Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:7-8
These verses command generosity and lending freely to the poor, opposing the implication in Job 22:6 where Job is accused of acting unkindly by exacting pledges.
Deuteronomy 15:7-8: If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother:
Paradox #1
Job 22:6 is part of a speech by Eliphaz, one of Job's friends, accusing Job of wrongdoing. The potential contradiction here is that Eliphaz inaccurately assumes that Job's suffering is due to his sins. This goes against the broader message of the book of Job, which illustrates that suffering is not always a direct result of personal sin. The inconsistency arises because the friends' simplistic understanding of God's justice is challenged by the narrative and outcome of the story.
Paradox #2
Job 22:6 could be seen as potentially inconsistent with teachings about kindness and caring for others. It suggests taking pledges or security from people unfairly, which seems at odds with biblical messages about helping the poor and treating others with compassion. This could be seen as conflicting with values like mercy and support for the needy found in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
Job 22:6 could be seen as highlighting a contradiction if it's perceived as suggesting unfair treatment of the poor or vulnerable. If someone were to interpret this as endorsing or accusing someone of exploiting others, it would conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize kindness, fairness, and protection for those in need.