Contradiction with John 16:33
This verse speaks about the inevitability of tribulation for believers, contrasting with the restoration and comfort experienced by Job in Job 42:11.
John 16:33: These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.
Contradiction with James 1:2-3
These verses encourage rejoicing in trials because they produce perseverance, unlike Job 42:11, where Job is comforted after his trials.
James 1:2-3: My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; [temptations: or, trials]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:11-12
These verses bless those who are persecuted, suggesting enduring hardship, unlike Job 42:11, where Job's friends and family comfort him after his suffering.
Matthew 5:11-12: Blessed are ye, when [men] shall revile you, and persecute [you], and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. [falsely: Gr. lying]
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 12:9-10
Paul speaks about taking pleasure in his weaknesses and hardships, which contrasts with Job 42:11, where Job's tribulations are acknowledged and alleviated by others.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10: And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 4:12-13
These verses talk about not being surprised by fiery trials as if something unusual is happening, whereas in Job 42:11, there is a distinct shift from Job's trials to a time of comfort.
1 Peter 4:12-13: Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you:
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in this verse might be the sudden change in the attitudes of Job's family and friends. Initially, they distanced themselves from him during his hardships but later offered comfort and gifts after his fortunes were restored. This could suggest a moral inconsistency in their loyalty and support, highlighting a tendency to offer support only when it is convenient or beneficial.