Contradiction with Matthew 15:24
Jesus states He was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel, indicating exclusivity to one group, contrasting with John 10:16's inclusion of other "sheep."
Matthew 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with Galatians 2:7-9
Paul describes a division of ministry between the circumcised and the uncircumcised, which could imply separate groups rather than one unified flock.
Galatians 2:7-9: But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as [the gospel] of the circumcision [was] unto Peter;
Contradiction with Matthew 10:5-6
Jesus instructs His disciples not to go to the Gentiles, suggesting a limited focus contrary to the broader reach implied in John 10:16.
Matthew 10:5-6: These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into [any] city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
Contradiction with Romans 15:8
Paul describes Christ as a minister to the circumcision, implying primary focus on Jewish people, which contrasts with the inclusion of others in John 10:16.
Romans 15:8: Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises [made] unto the fathers:
Paradox #1
The potential issue in John 10:16 could be the interpretation of "other sheep." Some view this as inconsistent with the idea that salvation is only for a specific group because it suggests inclusion of others beyond the initial audience. This can create theological debates about who is included in salvation.
Paradox #2
The verse can raise questions about the inclusion of non-Jewish people, or "Gentiles," into the spiritual community. Some might see this as conflicting with earlier parts of the Bible where God's covenant was primarily with the Jewish people. It addresses who is included in God's plan and how that inclusion works with earlier teachings.
Paradox #3
John 10:16 may present a contradiction or inconsistency regarding the concept of "one flock, one shepherd" in relation to different religious groups or traditions interpreting their inclusion in or distinction from this unified group. Various Christian denominations and other religions might have differing views on who is part of this "flock," leading to debates on religious exclusivity or inclusivity.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction in John 10:16 could be the idea of exclusivity versus inclusivity in religious belief. The verse suggests bringing different groups together under one belief system, which might conflict with the idea of respecting diverse paths and traditions. Some might see this as conflicting with the value of religious pluralism, where multiple belief systems can coexist and be equally valid.