Contradiction with Psalm 82:6
Contrary to John 10:35 declaring scripture cannot be broken, this verse refers to humans as "gods," implying a flexible interpretation by Jesus in John 10:34-35, wherein the divine status of scripture may be seen as contingent or metaphorical.
Psalm 82:6: I have said, Ye [are] gods; and all of you [are] children of the most High.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:18
John 10:35 states scripture cannot be broken, but Matthew 5:18 emphasizes even the smallest part of the law must be fulfilled, implying strict permanence rather than inherent flexibility or interpretative freedom indicated in John 10:35.
Matthew 5:18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:18-19
John 10:35 points to the unbreakable nature of scripture, yet Hebrews 7:18-19 speaks of a change and annulling of a former command due to its weakness, suggesting that not all scripture remains unbreakable or perpetually binding.
Hebrews 7:18-19: For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.
Contradiction with Mark 7:13
Suggests scriptures can be voided through traditions, which contrasts John 10:35’s implication that scripture is unbreakable and holds ultimate authority.
Mark 7:13: And when he had called all the people [unto him], he said unto them, Hearken unto me every one [of you], and understand:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:13
This verse speaks of Christ redeeming us from the curse of the Law, suggesting the Law (scripture) can be 'broken' or changed in its impact, in contrast to the unbreakable nature in John 10:35.
Galatians 3:13: Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree:
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in John 10:35 could be the idea that the scripture cannot be broken, which might seem in conflict with interpretations that suggest some biblical teachings adapt or change over time. This can raise questions about how literal or flexible scripture should be understood, leading to debates about consistency.