Contradiction with Matthew 26:39
In this verse, Jesus prays to have the cup removed, suggesting a desire to avoid the suffering, while John 12:27 shows Him accepting the necessity of His hour.
Matthew 26:39: And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?
Contradiction with John 18:11
Jesus tells Peter to put away his sword and expresses acceptance of the cup given by His Father, seemingly without distress, unlike the troubled soul in John 12:27.
John 18:11: Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?
Contradiction with Mark 14:36
This verse shows Jesus expressing a wish for the hour to pass from Him, contrasting with His resolved acceptance in John 12:27.
Mark 14:36: And he said, Abba, Father, all things [are] possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt.
Contradiction with Matthew 16:21-22
Peter rebukes Jesus for speaking of His suffering and death, contrasting with Jesus’ ultimate acceptance of His coming sacrifice in John 12:27.
Matthew 16:21-22: From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
Contradiction with Luke 22:42
Jesus requests for the cup to be removed if possible, showing a moment of hesitation that contrasts with John 12:27 where His troubled spirit acknowledges the necessity of His hour.
Luke 22:42: Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. [willing, remove: Gr. willing to remove]
Contradiction with John 10:18
Jesus speaks of His authority to lay down His life willingly, portraying confidence and decisiveness, whereas John 12:27 shows Him troubled.
John 10:18: No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in John 12:27 could relate to the notion of Jesus feeling troubled. Some might see this as conflicting with the belief in Jesus' divine nature, which could imply that he wouldn't experience human emotions like distress or fear. However, this is often explained by the understanding that Jesus was both fully divine and fully human, and thus capable of experiencing human emotions.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with John 12:27 could be related to the tension between Jesus expressing distress about his impending suffering and the understanding of his divine confidence and purpose. Some might see a conflict in how a figure who is aware of his divine mission would express hesitation or turmoil about fulfilling it. This could be seen as inconsistent with the portrayal of Jesus as a completely willing and resolute participant in the salvation plan.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in John 12:27 might arise from the struggle between desire and duty. On one hand, there's a natural human desire to avoid suffering and seek safety. On the other hand, there is the acceptance of a difficult path because it serves a greater purpose or duty. The tension between self-preservation and fulfilling one's mission can create internal conflict.