Contradiction with John 6:44
This verse suggests that it is ultimately God who draws individuals to Jesus, not the individuals who choose to go or come on their own, contrasting with the notion of choice and appointment in John 15:16.
John 6:44: No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:12-13
These verses emphasize working out one's salvation with fear and trembling, highlighting human effort, but also state that God works in them, suggesting divine influence, contrasting with the idea that human choice (or lack thereof) is guided by God as stated in John 15:16.
Philippians 2:12-13: Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
Contradiction with Joshua 24:15
This verse emphasizes the ability of people to choose whom they will serve, which appears to contrast with John 15:16, where choice is depicted as Jesus choosing the disciples, rather than the disciples choosing Him.
Joshua 24:15: And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that [were] on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with that verse could arise from the concept of free will. If individuals are chosen or appointed, it might seem to conflict with the idea that people have the free will to make their own choices regarding faith and actions. This tension between divine choice and human free will can be challenging to reconcile for some interpretations.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this verse might arise from the idea of free will versus divine choice. Some might see a tension between the belief that individuals can freely choose their paths and the notion that choices are predestined or made by a higher power. This could challenge the understanding of personal autonomy in decision-making.