Contradiction with Romans 4:15
This verse states, "Where no law is, there is no transgression," suggesting that sin is not imputed without law, whereas John 15:22 implies people are not guilty without Jesus' coming and words.
Romans 4:15: Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, [there is] no transgression.
Contradiction with Acts 17:30
This verse mentions that God overlooked ignorance in the past, while John 15:22 implies knowledge and exposure to Jesus' words are necessary for guilt.
Acts 17:30: And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Contradiction with James 4:17
It states that anyone who knows to do good and does not do it sins, implying awareness of good leads to sin, not merely Jesus' words as suggested in John 15:22.
James 4:17: Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 1:13
Paul speaks of receiving mercy because he acted in ignorance and unbelief which contrasts with John 15:22's implication of guilt post-knowledge.
1 Timothy 1:13: Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did [it] ignorantly in unbelief.
Contradiction with Romans 2:12
It claims those who sin without law will perish without law, suggesting accountability exists without explicit exposure as in John 15:22.
Romans 2:12: For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction because the verse suggests that awareness of Jesus' words brings accountability for sin. This could conflict with the idea that sin still exists without direct knowledge of Jesus, raising questions about the fate of those who have never heard his teachings.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or conflict could arise from the idea of accountability. In John 15:22, it suggests people would not be guilty if they had not been exposed to the truth or had not heard Jesus' message. This could conflict with other parts of the Bible where people seem to be held accountable regardless of their awareness or exposure to specific teachings. This raises questions about fairness and the nature of sin and guilt.
Paradox #3
Some people might see a contradiction in this verse because it suggests accountability for sin depends on exposure to Jesus's teachings. This could be seen as inconsistent with the idea that all people are inherently sinful or that God's messages were known before Jesus. However, interpretations vary widely, and not everyone sees this as a conflict.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in John 15:22 could arise from the idea that people are held accountable only after being informed of a wrongdoing, which may conflict with the belief that wrong actions are inherently wrong, regardless of awareness. This could raise questions about justice and fairness in situations where individuals lack knowledge.