Contradiction with James 1:13
This verse states that God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempts any man, while John 16:8 suggests the Spirit convicts the world of sin, implying a divine influence on moral discernment.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Romans 2:4
This verse emphasizes God's goodness leading to repentance, contrasting with John 16:8 where the conviction of sin by the Spirit implies an active role in moral correction.
Romans 2:4: Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
Contradiction with Romans 8:1
This verse declares no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus, whereas John 16:8 indicates the Spirit convicts the world of judgment, implying potential condemnation.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with 1 John 3:9
This verse states that whoever is born of God does not commit sin, conflicting with the idea in John 16:8 of the Spirit convicting the world of sin.
1 John 3:9: Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. [is born: or, has been born]
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:17
This verse mentions sins and iniquities remembered no more, which seems to contrast with the notion of continuous conviction of sin in John 16:8.
Hebrews 10:17: And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more. [And their: some copies have, Then he said, And their]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in John 16:8 might arise from the idea that the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment. Some could see a contradiction in the concept of free will; if the Holy Spirit is actively guiding people towards understanding these things, it may seem to interfere with the idea that humans have the freedom to choose their beliefs and actions without divine influence. This tension can lead to questions about the balance between divine intervention and human autonomy.