Contradiction with John 11:50
In John 11:50, Caiaphas suggests it is expedient for one man to die for the people, which he argues as a necessary decision, in contrast to John 18:14 where his stance appears as a predetermined necessity rather than a considered opinion.
John 11:50: Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in John 18:14 could be seen in the figure of Caiaphas, who advised that it was better for one man to die for the people. This might seem contradictory to the ethical principle of justice, where punishing or sacrificing an innocent person for the benefit of others is generally considered wrong. It raises questions about the morality of sacrificing one for the greater good, conflicting with the idea of fairness and individual rights.