Contradiction with John 8:15
This verse contradicts John 18:31 because Jesus explains that He judges no man, whereas the Jews claim they are not permitted to execute judgment.
John 8:15: Ye judge after the flesh; I judge no man.
Contradiction with John 3:17
This verse contradicts John 18:31 as Jesus says He was not sent to condemn the world, yet in John 18:31, there is an implication of condemnation by human authority.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse contradicts John 18:31 by highlighting the teaching to "judge not," which differs from the approach of handing Jesus over for judgment.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse contradicts John 18:31 because it advises leaving vengeance to God, opposing the act of judgment and punishment mentioned.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with James 4:12
This verse contradicts John 18:31 by stating there is only one Lawgiver and Judge, challenging the authority claimed by earthly judges.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
In John 18:31, there might appear to be a contradiction or inconsistency because the Jewish leaders tell Pilate they cannot execute anyone, yet in other parts of the Bible, Jewish laws and traditions include the authority to carry out capital punishment, such as stoning for certain offenses. This could seem inconsistent with their statement to Pilate, potentially signaling a political maneuver rather than a strict legal limitation.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in John 18:31 could be seen in the sense of justice and responsibility. The verse involves a legal matter where authorities pass the responsibility back and forth, avoiding direct action. This could be seen as inconsistency in taking responsibility and providing justice, as it reflects a lack of willingness to make a fair decision.