Contradiction with Matthew 27:15-17
Explains that Pilate was accustomed to releasing "a prisoner," but does not specify whom the crowd demanded, which may suggest a tradition contrary to the mention of a single prisoner, Barabbas, in John 18:39.
Matthew 27:15-17: Now at [that] feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would.
Contradiction with Mark 15:6-9
States that it was customary to release a prisoner chosen by the crowd, offering Barabbas or Jesus, without mentioning any tradition upheld by Pilate as John 18:39 implies.
Mark 15:6-9: Now at [that] feast he released unto them one prisoner, whomsoever they desired.
Contradiction with Luke 23:17-19
Suggests the crowd chose Barabbas without the option initially mentioned by Pilate nor the customary release explicitly highlighted as in John 18:39.
Luke 23:17-19: (For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)
Paradox #1
The verse John 18:39 is about a custom of releasing a prisoner at Passover. While this verse doesn't directly present a contradiction, it can be seen as inconsistent with other biblical themes that emphasize following the law and justice. The act of releasing a prisoner regardless of their crimes might seem to conflict with the idea of justice and accountability emphasized elsewhere in the Bible. However, this tension is more about interpretations of justice rather than a direct contradiction. Overall, this verse doesn't have a major doctrinal conflict but invites discussion about justice and mercy.