Contradiction with Deuteronomy 32:39
This verse suggests that God alone has the power to kill and make alive, while John 19:11 implies that the authority is given to others.
Deuteronomy 32:39: See now that I, [even] I, [am] he, and [there is] no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither [is there any] that can deliver out of my hand.
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
This verse indicates that a man's heart plans his way, but the Lord directs his steps, suggesting that human authorities might not have intrinsic power.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Contradiction with Romans 13:1
This verse states that all authority comes from God, supporting the notion in John 19:11, but it might contradict if interpreted to mean that earthly rulers always act according to God's purpose.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with Daniel 4:17
This suggests that God gives kingdoms to whomsoever He will, which can contradict with the human perception of authority mentioned in John 19:11.
Daniel 4:17: This matter [is] by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
Contradiction with Matthew 28:18
This states that all power is given to Jesus in heaven and on earth, potentially contradicting the idea that Pilate's authority is given for a specific moment or task.
Matthew 28:18: And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Paradox #1
Some readers might see a conflict with the idea of divine justice. The verse implies that certain people have greater sin due to receiving authority, which could raise questions about accountability and fairness for those in positions of power compared to others. However, interpretations vary, and many theologians provide explanations that resolve this perceived inconsistency.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or inconsistency related to John 19:11 could stem from differing accounts of responsibility for Jesus's crucifixion. The verse implies certain authority and responsibility in the context of Jesus's trial, which may contrast with other parts of the Bible or historical records that assign responsibility differently between Roman and Jewish authorities. This can lead to debates over historical accuracy and interpretation of these events.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency might be in understanding authority and guilt. Jesus says that a greater sin is on the one who handed him over, implying levels of sin and responsibility. This might seem inconsistent with views that all sins are equal in the eyes of God, leading to confusion about the nature of sin and accountability.