Contradiction with John 1:12
While John 1:11 states that "his own" did not receive him, John 1:12 says that those who did receive him became the sons of God, implying reception by some.
John 1:12: But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: [power: or, the right, or, privilege]
Contradiction with Matthew 10:6
Here, Jesus instructs to go to "the lost sheep of the house of Israel," indicating that his mission was indeed focused on his own people, suggesting that they were a key part of his ministry.
Matthew 10:6: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:24
Jesus initially states he was sent only to "the lost sheep of the house of Israel," showing a clear focus on his own people, contrary to the idea that they did not receive him at all.
Matthew 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with Acts 2:41
Three thousand souls gladly received the word and were baptized, indicating acceptance among his own people, not complete rejection.
Acts 2:41: Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added [unto them] about three thousand souls.
Contradiction with Romans 11:1
Paul asserts that God has not rejected his people, indicating that there remains a reception and inclusion within God’s plan.
Romans 11:1: I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.
Paradox #1
The verse highlights the idea of Jesus coming to his own people and being rejected by them. Some see this as a contradiction because it seems to go against the concept of a loving, accepting, and all-powerful God whose chosen people would naturally recognize and embrace Him. However, others interpret it as part of a larger plan involving free will and the fulfillment of prophecy.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction in this verse could be the idea of rejection. It highlights a situation where someone brings something valuable, but the intended recipients do not accept it, which can be seen as conflicting with the moral expectation to recognize and accept what is good or true.