Contradiction with Romans 6:14
This verse states that believers are not under the law but under grace, which aligns more with John 1:17, rather than contradicting the notion of law replaced by grace.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states He has not come to destroy the law or the prophets, which may contradict the idea of grace completely replacing the law as suggested in John 1:17.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse states that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, potentially contradicting the emphasis on grace through Jesus Christ in John 1:17.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Galatians 2:16
Although it emphasizes faith in Jesus Christ above the works of the law, suggesting contradiction depends on interpretation rather than direct opposition.
Galatians 2:16: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
This verse suggests that faith does not nullify the law but establishes it, which might contradict a perception of the law's obsolescence in John 1:17.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Paradox #1
John 1:17 speaks about grace and truth coming through Jesus Christ, which some might see as a contradiction to the Old Testament emphasis on the law given through Moses. The potential conflict arises when one interprets the grace and truth brought by Jesus as replacing or negating the laws given in the Old Testament. While some view the law as strict and grace as more lenient, others believe grace fulfills the law rather than contradicting it.
Paradox #2
John 1:17 could be seen as presenting a potential inconsistency by contrasting the law given through Moses with the grace and truth that came through Jesus Christ. Some might view this as a contradiction between the Old Testament focus on the law and the New Testament emphasis on grace. However, many theological interpretations suggest this is not a contradiction but rather a development in God's plan, where the law is seen as a foundation leading to the grace offered through Jesus.
Paradox #3
John 1:17 may present a contradiction or conflict by contrasting the law given through Moses with grace and truth through Jesus Christ. This can be seen as a tension between following strict rules or commandments and embracing forgiveness and compassion, potentially causing confusion on how to balance these principles in one's life.