Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
John 2:15 describes Jesus taking aggressive action in the temple, whereas Matthew 5:39 advises to not resist evil and turn the other cheek.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 21:5
John 2:15 depicts Jesus in a forceful manner; Matthew 21:5 describes Him as meek and humble.
Matthew 21:5: Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass.
Contradiction with James 1:20
John 2:15 shows Jesus acting in anger, while James 1:20 says that human anger does not produce righteousness.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
John 2:15 portrays Jesus taking matters into His own hands, whereas Romans 12:19 advises to leave vengeance to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:23
John 2:15 narrates assertive behavior by Jesus, but 1 Peter 2:23 highlights how He did not retaliate when He suffered.
1 Peter 2:23: Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed [himself] to him that judgeth righteously: [himself: or, his cause]
Paradox #1
The contradiction some people see in John 2:15 relates to the depiction of Jesus showing anger and using force, which seems to conflict with other teachings about love, peace, and non-violence. This action might appear inconsistent with the image of Jesus as a gentle and forgiving figure.
Paradox #2
One possible doctrinal inconsistency with John 2:15 could be related to the idea of Jesus' behavior and teachings about peace and violence. In some parts of the Bible, Jesus teaches about love, peace, and turning the other cheek. However, in this verse, His actions might seem more aggressive, which could seem inconsistent with his teachings on non-violence. This could lead to discussions about the context and nature of righteous anger.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict related to John 2:15 might involve the interpretation of Jesus' actions in driving out the money changers from the temple. Some people see a contradiction in the portrayal of Jesus, who is generally viewed as a figure promoting peace and love, engaging in an act that seems violent or angry. This action conflicts with the typical image of a peaceful, non-confrontational Jesus presented in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction or conflict might arise from the fact that, in this verse, actions of force or anger could be seen as contrary to other teachings that emphasize peace, love, and forgiveness. This might seem inconsistent with the idea of turning the other cheek or loving your enemies.