Contradiction with Philippians 2:6
This verse states that Jesus, "being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God," aligning with John 5:18 rather than contradicting it.
Philippians 2:6: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
Contradiction with Hebrews 1:3
Calls Jesus the "brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person," supporting His divine nature rather than opposing it.
Hebrews 1:3: Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;
Paradox #1
This verse might cause confusion for some people because it mentions that Jesus was calling God his own Father, implying that he was making himself equal with God. This can raise questions about the understanding of the relationship between Jesus and God, especially concerning the concept of the Trinity, where Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct but one. Some people might see this as challenging to comprehend or reconcile with the idea of Jesus having both a divine and human nature.
Paradox #2
John 5:18 might create a doctrinal conflict regarding the understanding of Jesus' nature and relationship with God. Some might see it as problematic because it presents Jesus as claiming equality with God, which could conflict with the belief in monotheism — the idea that there is only one God. This could be seen as inconsistent with Old Testament teachings that emphasize the oneness of God, leading to debates about the nature of the Trinity and whether Jesus' divine status undermines monotheistic principles.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or conflict in this verse could be related to the differing interpretations of Jesus claiming equality with God. For some believers, this claim aligns perfectly with their understanding of Jesus as divine. However, for others, especially those with a strict interpretation of monotheistic principles, this claim might seem inconsistent with the belief in one God. This difference in interpretation could lead to disagreements about the nature of Jesus and God's relationship.