Contradiction with John 10:30
This verse implies that Jesus and the Father are one, suggesting equality rather than Jesus doing only what He sees the Father doing.
John 10:30: I and [my] Father are one.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:6
This verse portrays Jesus as having equality with God, which could be seen as contrary to Him doing nothing of Himself but only what He sees the Father doing.
Philippians 2:6: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
Contradiction with Colossians 1:19
This verse states that all the fullness dwells in Jesus, implying a complete and independent divinity that contrasts with doing only what He sees the Father do.
Colossians 1:19: For it pleased [the Father] that in him should all fulness dwell;
Contradiction with John 1:1
This verse declares that the Word was God, implying equality and oneness with God, contradicting the idea of only imitating the Father.
John 1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Contradiction with John 14:9
This verse implies that seeing Jesus is seeing the Father, suggesting a unity that goes beyond merely copying the Father's actions.
John 14:9: Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou [then], Shew us the Father?
Paradox #1
John 5:19 could raise a theological question about the relationship between Jesus and God the Father. Some might see a potential conflict in understanding how Jesus, who is considered fully divine in Christian belief, can also be dependent on the Father for his actions. This could appear as a contradiction to the idea of Jesus having independent divine power, suggesting a more complex dynamic within the concept of the Trinity.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in this verse could stem from the idea of dependence versus autonomy. It suggests that Jesus does only what he sees the Father doing, which might conflict with the idea of independent moral decision-making. This could raise questions about free will and the expectation for individuals to make their own moral choices rather than just imitating or following commands.