Contradiction with John 10:30
It states "I and my Father are one," suggesting unity and equal authority, contrasting with John 5:30, where Jesus emphasizes His dependence on the Father.
John 10:30: I and [my] Father are one.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:6
This verse states that Jesus, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God, which contrasts with John 5:30's expression of relying on the Father's will.
Philippians 2:6: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
Contradiction with Colossians 2:9
It asserts that in Jesus dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily, implying His divine authority independently, which contrasts with the dependence described in John 5:30.
Colossians 2:9: For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Contradiction with John 14:9
Jesus says, "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father," indicating a complete representation of the Father's authority, possibly contradicting the perception of subordinate judgment in John 5:30.
John 14:9: Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou [then], Shew us the Father?
Contradiction with Hebrews 1:3
Describes Jesus as the brightness of God's glory and the express image of his person, suggesting divine authority, which may contradict His statement in John 5:30 about not seeking His own will.
Hebrews 1:3: Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;
Paradox #1
Some people find a potential contradiction in comparing this verse with the belief in the divinity of Jesus. If Jesus is understood to be divine and co-equal with God, his statement about not being able to do anything by himself might seem inconsistent with his divine nature. This raises questions about the relationship between Jesus’ human and divine aspects.
Paradox #2
John 5:30 might raise questions about the relationship between Jesus and God, especially regarding the idea of Jesus having a will distinct from God's. In some interpretations, it could seem inconsistent with the belief that Jesus and God are fully unified or one in essence. This might appear to conflict with the doctrine of the Trinity, where Jesus is seen as fully divine and fully aligned with God's will. However, many theologians explain this by highlighting the dual nature of Christ as both human and divine, suggesting that the verse reflects Jesus' human submission to God.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in John 5:30 could be related to the nature of Jesus' divine authority and human submission. In this verse, Jesus says he can do nothing on his own, which might seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize his divine power and authority. This could be seen as a conflict because it raises questions about how Jesus can be both fully divine and fully human if he is expressing a dependency on God the Father.
Paradox #4
John 5:30 can be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency when compared to other parts of the Bible where Jesus is described as having full divine authority and power. In this verse, Jesus talks about not being able to do things on his own and seeking to do God's will, which may seem inconsistent with passages that emphasize his divine nature and equality with God. This can create confusion about the balance between his humanity and divinity.