Contradiction with Matthew 11:28
This verse invites all who labor and are heavy laden to come to Jesus, suggesting that individuals can come on their own initiative without being drawn.
Matthew 11:28: Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Contradiction with Revelation 3:20
Jesus stands at the door and knocks, and if anyone hears His voice and opens the door, He will come in, implying that the individual can choose to respond to Jesus without being drawn by the Father.
Revelation 3:20: Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
Contradiction with James 4:8
This verse encourages individuals to draw near to God, and He will draw near to them, suggesting a mutual drawing rather than being solely drawn by the Father.
James 4:8: Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse [your] hands, [ye] sinners; and purify [your] hearts, [ye] double minded.
Contradiction with Acts 17:30
God commands all people everywhere to repent, indicating a universal call that everyone can respond to, rather than being drawn by the Father specifically.
Acts 17:30: And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Contradiction with Romans 10:13
Whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved, which implies that anyone has the ability to come to salvation through their own decision, without needing to be drawn.
Romans 10:13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
The verse states that God is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance, suggesting an open invitation to all, which contrasts with being drawn specifically by the Father.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
John 6:44 might appear to have a contradiction or inconsistency when it comes to the concepts of free will and predestination. Some people interpret this verse as suggesting that humans cannot choose to come to God on their own; only those drawn by God can come to Him. This might conflict with other parts of the Bible that suggest humans have the free will to seek God or accept salvation. The tension between God's sovereignty in drawing people and human responsibility in choosing can be seen as a theological conflict.
Paradox #2
John 6:44 could be seen as conflicting with the idea of free will in choosing faith. The verse suggests that God must draw a person to Him, which might contradict the belief that individuals have the freedom to choose or reject faith on their own. This can lead to debates about how much control humans have in the process of believing and whether salvation is initiated by God or requires a human decision.
Paradox #3
The possible contradiction with John 6:44 could be about the concepts of free will and predestination. Some people might see an inconsistency between this verse and the idea that humans can freely choose to follow or reject God. This can create a debate between the belief that God controls who follows Him and the belief in individual choice.
Paradox #4
Some people might see a contradiction in the idea that, if only those drawn by a higher power can come forward, it raises questions about free will. Does it mean that individuals don't have a choice in their belief, and how does that align with personal responsibility or accountability in faith?