Contradiction with John 6:63
Emphasizes the spirit over the flesh, suggesting that the physical consumption is not the path to life.
John 6:63: It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 8:8
States that food does not affect our relationship with God, neither commend us to God nor make us worse.
1 Corinthians 8:8: But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse. [are we the better: or, have we the more] [are we the worse: or, have we the less]
Contradiction with Romans 14:17
Asserts that the kingdom of God is not about eating and drinking but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.
Romans 14:17: For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
Indicates that it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person but what comes out, thus downplaying the importance of physical consumption.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Paradox #1
John 6:55 could be seen as a contradiction or conflict when it is compared to the perspectives of different Christian denominations on the Eucharist or Communion. Some believe that the elements of bread and wine truly become the body and blood of Jesus (a view held by Catholics and some other traditions), while others view them as symbolic (common in many Protestant traditions). The verse can cause differing interpretations and disagreements about the nature of Communion.
Paradox #2
Some people think there is a contradiction because John 6:55 talks about eating Jesus' body and drinking his blood, which could seem to conflict with other parts of the Bible that prohibit consuming blood. This might confuse those trying to understand how these ideas fit together.
Paradox #3
Some people see a contradiction in John 6:55 because it talks about eating Jesus' flesh and drinking his blood. This can be confusing because it seems to go against Jewish dietary laws, which forbid consuming blood. This idea might conflict with Jewish practices and beliefs at the time.
Paradox #4
Some people might see a moral conflict in this verse because it talks about eating Jesus' flesh and drinking his blood, which can be confusing or troubling. This could seem like it goes against basic ideas of morality and respect for life. However, for many believers, it's understood as a symbol, not a literal command, representing spiritual nourishment.