Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 1:5
The verse describes the sun as rising and setting in a regular cycle, contrasting with Joshua 10:13 which describes the sun standing still.
Ecclesiastes 1:5: The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose. [hasteth: Heb. panteth]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 33:20
This verse implies the unbreakable nature of day and night cycles, contrasting with the interruption described in Joshua 10:13.
Jeremiah 33:20: Thus saith the LORD; If ye can break my covenant of the day, and my covenant of the night, and that there should not be day and night in their season;
Contradiction with Genesis 8:22
States that day and night shall not cease, contradicting the event where the sun stood still in Joshua 10:13.
Genesis 8:22: While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease. [While...: Heb. As yet all the days of the earth]
Contradiction with Psalm 104:19
Describes the regular occurrences of day and night, implying a regularity that Joshua 10:13 disrupts.
Psalm 104:19: He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down.
Contradiction with Job 38:33
Suggests that celestial laws, presumably including those governing the sun, are fixed, whereas Joshua 10:13 recounts a suspension of these laws.
Job 38:33: Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth?
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction in Joshua 10:13 because it describes the sun standing still, which doesn't fit with our understanding of how the solar system works. In science, we know that the Earth rotates around the sun, not the other way around. So, from a scientific viewpoint, this event seems impossible. Some see this as a conflict between the Bible's description of events and modern scientific knowledge. However, others view this story as symbolic or as a miracle that doesn't follow natural laws.
Paradox #2
Joshua 10:13 describes a miraculous event where the sun stands still in the sky. Some people see a contradiction or conflict with scientific understanding, as this event challenges what we know about how the solar system works, specifically the Earth orbiting the sun and the natural laws governing motion. This creates a tension between a literal interpretation of the text and scientific perspectives.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Joshua 10:13 involves the description of the sun standing still. This event conflicts with our understanding of astronomy and physics, as celestial bodies do not stop their movement in the way described. Some people have also pointed out that ancient Near Eastern literature sometimes uses similar language figuratively rather than literally, leading to debates about interpretation.
Paradox #4
The scientific conflict with Joshua 10:13 arises from its description of the sun standing still in the sky. Modern science understands that the Earth rotates around the sun and that the sun appearing to move across the sky is due to Earth's rotation. To make the sun "stand still" as described, Earth's rotation would need to stop, which would cause catastrophic consequences due to the laws of physics, such as inertia. Hence, this event described in the verse conflicts with our understanding of astronomy and physics.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in Joshua 10:13 could be seen as the clash between the normal natural order created by God and the idea of altering it for human battles. It raises questions about the divine intervention in human warfare and whether it aligns with the broader moral teachings of peace and harmony.
Paradox #6
The contradiction in Joshua 10:13 is related to the description of the sun and moon standing still for about a whole day. This could conflict with our scientific understanding of astronomy and the Earth's rotation, as the event suggests a suspension of natural laws and processes that would typically govern the movement of celestial bodies.