Contradiction with Psalm 33:16
Joshua 10:41 shows Israel's conquest by military might, whereas Psalm 33:16 asserts that victory is not achieved through great armies or strength.
Psalm 33:16: There is no king saved by the multitude of an host: a mighty man is not delivered by much strength.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Joshua 10:41 describes destruction of enemies, but Matthew 5:44 teaches to love and pray for enemies.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Joshua 10:41 involves killing during conquests, while Exodus 20:13 commands not to kill.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Joshua 10:41 recounts war and conquest, whereas Isaiah 2:4 envisions a future without war.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Joshua 10:41 depicts vengeance on adversaries, yet Romans 12:17 advises against repaying evil for evil.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with John 13:34
Joshua 10:41 involves conflict and destruction, while John 13:34 commands believers to love one another.
John 13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Joshua 10:41 recounts warfare, yet Matthew 26:52 warns that those who live by the sword will perish by the sword.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency with Joshua 10:41 could be related to the broader debate about the historical accuracy of the events described in the Book of Joshua. Some scholars argue that archaeological evidence does not fully support the large-scale destruction and conquest of cities in Canaan as described in these accounts. This has led to discussions about whether these events happened as described or were later additions to emphasize Israel's claims to the land.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a moral conflict in this verse because it describes events of war and destruction, which could seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and compassionate God. The actions taken can be viewed as harsh or extreme, raising questions about justice and morality.