Contradiction with Judges 1:8
It states that the children of Judah fought against Jerusalem and captured it, which contradicts Joshua 11:10's implication that Joshua captured key cities.
Judges 1:8: Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem, and had taken it, and smitten it with the edge of the sword, and set the city on fire.
Contradiction with Judges 1:21
Indicates that the Jebusites were not driven out of Jerusalem, conflicting with Joshua's complete conquests mentioned in Joshua 11:10.
Judges 1:21: And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem; but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day.
Contradiction with Joshua 15:63
States that Judah could not drive out the Jebusites in Jerusalem, contradicting the idea of a complete conquest in Joshua 11:10.
Joshua 15:63: As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah could not drive them out: but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Joshua 11:10 could be seen in the context of divine command and moral ethics. The verse involves the destruction of a city and its inhabitants. Some might argue this raises questions about the morality of violence and killing, especially when ordered or sanctioned by a divine figure. This can create tension between the ethical teachings of compassion and the acts of destruction depicted.