Contradiction with Amos 9:15
While Joshua 15:34 lists territorial allocations, Amos 9:15 speaks of God planting Israel never to be uprooted, contrasting temporary land assignments with permanent possession.
Amos 9:15: And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the LORD thy God.
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:2-3
Joshua 15:34 specifies a limited territory, but Isaiah 54:2-3 speaks of an expanding territory, which contrasts the fixed boundaries seen in Joshua.
Isaiah 54:2-3: Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes;
Contradiction with Genesis 15:18
In Joshua 15:34 territorial distribution is specific to certain cities, whereas Genesis 15:18 promises a much larger land area to Abraham's descendants, presenting a contradiction in scope.
Genesis 15:18: In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
Contradiction with Hebrews 11:9-10
Joshua 15:34 deals with the tangible inheritance of land, whereas Hebrews 11:9-10 highlights the transitory nature of earthly domains compared to the eternal city built by God.
Hebrews 11:9-10: By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as [in] a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise:
Contradiction with Acts 7:5
Joshua 15:34 implies land allocation, but Acts 7:5 states that God gave Abraham no inheritance in it, not even a foot of ground, presenting a contradiction.
Acts 7:5: And he gave him none inheritance in it, no, not [so much as] to set his foot on: yet he promised that he would give it to him for a possession, and to his seed after him, when [as yet] he had no child.