Contradiction with Joshua 21:32
Joshua 21:32 mentions the cities given to the tribe of Naphtali, highlighting differences in the allotments compared to Joshua 19:44's focus on Dan, potentially contradicting the supposed permanence and exclusivity of land allocation.
Joshua 21:32: And out of the tribe of Naphtali, Kedesh in Galilee with her suburbs, [to be] a city of refuge for the slayer; and Hammothdor with her suburbs, and Kartan with her suburbs; three cities.
Contradiction with Judges 1:34
Judges 1:34 describes how the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountains, indicating a contradiction to the notion of stable possession in Joshua 19:44.
Judges 1:34: And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain: for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley:
Contradiction with Jeremiah 8:16
Describes trouble coming from the territory of Dan, which could contradict the idea of peaceful possession and settlement implied in Joshua 19:44.
Jeremiah 8:16: The snorting of his horses was heard from Dan: the whole land trembled at the sound of the neighing of his strong ones; for they are come, and have devoured the land, and all that is in it; the city, and those that dwell therein. [all...: Heb. the fulness thereof]
Contradiction with Judges 18:1
Contradicts the allocation described in Joshua 19:44 by indicating that the tribe of Dan was still seeking an inheritance to dwell in, as they had not yet settled in the land given to them.
Judges 18:1: In those days [there was] no king in Israel: and in those days the tribe of the Danites sought them an inheritance to dwell in; for unto that day [all their] inheritance had not fallen unto them among the tribes of Israel.