Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Joshua 1:15 emphasizes warfare for land possession, while Matthew 5:9 blesses peacemakers, suggesting a preference for peace over conflict.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Joshua 1:15 discusses taking land by force after rest, whereas Matthew 5:39 advises against retaliation, encouraging turning the other cheek.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with James 3:18
Joshua 1:15 supports achieving rest through conquest, in contrast to James 3:18, which associates peace with righteousness through peaceful means.
James 3:18: And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Joshua 1:15 involves seizing and taking land as a directive, while Romans 12:18 encourages living peaceably with others when possible.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Joshua 1:15 speaks of asserting force for rest and inheritance, but Luke 6:27 teaches love towards enemies, promoting non-violence.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in that verse could relate to the idea of taking possession of land that belongs to others, which may conflict with modern views on property rights and justice. This raises questions about fairness and the ethics of conquest.