Contradiction with Matthew 12:30
This verse declares that anyone not with Christ is against Him, contrasting Joshua 22:25, wherein the tribes seek to maintain unity despite physical separation.
Matthew 12:30: He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Contradiction with James 4:4
Declares friendship with the world is enmity with God, contrasting Joshua 22:25 where separation from main tribes was not considered idolatry.
James 4:4: Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
Contradiction with 1 Kings 18:21
Elijah challenges Israel to fully commit to God, contradicting the idea of distancing in Joshua 22:25, which suggests potential spiritual separation.
1 Kings 18:21: And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD [be] God, follow him: but if Baal, [then] follow him. And the people answered him not a word. [opinions: or, thoughts]
Contradiction with John 15:5
Emphasizes abiding in Christ for spiritual vitality, conflicting with Joshua 22:25's physical and perceived spiritual separation.
John 15:5: I am the vine, ye [are] the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. [without me: or, severed from me]
Contradiction with Luke 11:23
Mentions being against Christ if not actively with Him, conflicting with the tribes' intent of non-physical separation, not spiritual separation, in Joshua 22:25.
Luke 11:23: He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.
Paradox #1
The verse might raise a theological inconsistency regarding the unity of the Israelite tribes. It suggests a divide or boundary between tribes that could be seen as contradicting the idea of a united people under one God. This could lead to questions about their collective identity and their relationship with God.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal issue with Joshua 22:25 could be about the division and unity among the tribes of Israel. Some might see this as a conflict with the idea that all Israelites are part of one community under God's covenant. The verse might suggest a separation that seems inconsistent with the notion of unity among God's people.
Paradox #3
Joshua 22:25 could present a contradiction or conflict in understanding unity versus division. The verse highlights a division between groups, which might seem to conflict with other biblical teachings promoting unity and love among people. This can raise questions about how to balance maintaining distinct identities or boundaries with the broader call for unity.