Contradiction with Exodus 12:48
This verse states that any uncircumcised male cannot partake in the Passover, implying they should already be circumcised, while Joshua 5:2 initiates a new circumcision.
Exodus 12:48: And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.
Contradiction with Genesis 17:14
This verse indicates that any uncircumcised male shall be cut off from his people, suggesting all should have been circumcised already, whereas Joshua 5:2 commands a second circumcision.
Genesis 17:14: And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Joshua 5:2 could relate to the practice of mass circumcision described in the passage. Performing circumcisions on a large group of adult males at once, without modern medical techniques or anesthesia, could lead to significant health risks and complications, such as infections or excessive bleeding, which modern medicine aims to prevent. This contrasts with the contemporary understanding of medical procedures and post-operative care.
Paradox #2
The contradiction could be seen in the practice of circumcision as a religious requirement versus the concept of bodily autonomy and consent. Some might argue it's inconsistent to perform a physical and permanent act on individuals, especially infants, without their consent. This raises questions about personal choice and religious obedience.