Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
This verse suggests that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused, potentially contradicting the directive to keep away from accursed things.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Declares that nothing is unclean in itself, which contrasts the idea that accursed things could defile the camp.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Mark 7:15
States that there is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him, which could be seen as contrary to the notion of physical spoils being accursed.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:23
All things are lawful according to this verse, which might conflict with the prohibition on taking accursed things.
1 Corinthians 10:23: All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. [expedient: or, profitable]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Encourages not letting others judge you in matters of food and drink, contrasting the strict restrictions on certain items in Joshua.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Titus 1:15
To the pure, all things are pure, suggesting a fundamental purity that may oppose the concept of accursed objects.
Titus 1:15: Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or conflict in Joshua 6:18 could involve the idea of a loving and forgiving God commanding destruction or punishment for disobedience, which might seem inconsistent with the broader biblical message of mercy and grace. This raises questions about the balance between justice and compassion in God's character.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Joshua 6:18 could relate to the concept of collective punishment or the idea of being held accountable for actions not personally committed. This might seem inconsistent with the belief in individual responsibility and justice, as it risks punishing those who have not directly engaged in wrongdoing.