Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
This verse states that God does not change His mind, yet Joshua 8:34 implies a conditional outcome based on obeying or disobeying the law.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Romans 4:15
This verse indicates that the law brings wrath, while Joshua 8:34 presents the law as a guiding covenant for Israel.
Romans 4:15: Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, [there is] no transgression.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
This verse suggests that those who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, contrasting with the idea of blessings in Joshua 8:34.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
This verse declares believers are not under the law but under grace, which contradicts the presentation of the law as a guiding principle in Joshua 8:34.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
This verse states that the old covenant is obsolete, yet Joshua 8:34 is part of the adherence to the covenant law.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.