Contradiction with Romans 8:1
This verse states that there is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, while Jude 1:4 discusses condemnation for ungodly men who turn grace into lasciviousness.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with John 10:28
This verse promises eternal life and suggests believers shall never perish, which seems at odds with Jude 1:4's warning about condemnation for certain men.
John 10:28: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any [man] pluck them out of my hand.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:8-9
These verses emphasize salvation by grace through faith, not by works, while Jude 1:4 warns of ungodly men who abuse grace, suggesting a possible loss of salvation.
Ephesians 2:8-9: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Contradiction with Romans 6:1-2
While Jude 1:4 speaks of men turning grace into lasciviousness, Romans 6:1-2 argues against continuing in sin that grace may abound.
Romans 6:1-2: What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse speaks of God's patience and desire for all to come to repentance, while Jude 1:4 talks about those marked for condemnation.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
States God wants all men to be saved, which contrasts with Jude 1:4's mention of men ordained for condemnation.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Paradox #1
Jude 1:4 references ungodly people who pervert grace as a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ as Lord. A possible theological tension here could be regarding the concept of salvation and grace. Some may argue that it conflicts with the idea that grace alone assures salvation, as this verse implies that certain behaviors or denials could negate one's salvation. This could be seen as conflicting with doctrines that emphasize faith alone as the sole requirement for salvation.
Paradox #2
Jude 1:4 could potentially raise questions about the idea of God's grace being distorted into a license for immoral behavior, which might seem to contradict other teachings that emphasize grace as a transformative gift leading to righteous living. This could be seen as inconsistent with the concept of grace encouraging moral and ethical behavior.
Paradox #3
Jude 1:4 could present a contradiction, inconsistency, or conflict regarding the description of certain individuals as "ungodly" who secretly slipped into the community. The conflict might arise in understanding why such people would be able to gain influence in early Christian communities if the community was guided by strong teachings and leadership from the apostles. Additionally, there could be a potential inconsistency concerning the idea of predestination versus free will, as the verse suggests some people were "long ago marked out" for condemnation, raising questions about their ability to choose redemption.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in the verse could be the idea of predestination versus free will. If some people are marked out for condemnation, it raises questions about their ability to choose their actions freely and whether it is fair to judge them for something they were destined to do. This can conflict with the idea of personal responsibility and moral choice.