Contradiction with John 8:7
Judges 11:2 involves casting out based on birth status, while John 8:7 emphasizes not casting judgment unless one is without sin.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with James 2:9
Judges 11:2 involves partiality and exclusion due to birth, while James 2:9 condemns showing partiality as transgression.
James 2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Judges 11:2 shows division based on familial status, while Galatians 3:28 emphasizes unity and equality in Christ.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
Judges 11:2 involves judgment based on heritage, whereas Matthew 7:1 advises against judging others.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Romans 2:11
Judges 11:2 demonstrates favoritism toward certain heirs, whereas Romans 2:11 states there is no respect of persons with God.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
Judges 11:2 distinguishes based on family lineage, while Colossians 3:11 highlights no distinction in Christ.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Paradox #1
The verse might raise questions about fairness and inheritance rights. Inconsistent treatment of individuals based on circumstances of birth could conflict with later principles of justice and equality found in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in this verse revolves around differences in ancient customs and family dynamics. In some parts of the Bible, there are instances where children born outside of marriage or to different mothers are treated equally, but in this verse, Jephthah is rejected by his half-brothers because he is the son of a different mother. This raises questions about consistency in the treatment of family members within biblical narratives.
Paradox #3
Judges 11:2 can raise moral questions about fairness and inheritance rights. The verse talks about a person being excluded from his family due to his mother's status. This can be seen as unjust or inconsistent with the idea of equality, as it punishes someone without considering their own actions or character, only their birth circumstances.