Contradiction with Deuteronomy 2:9
This verse instructs not to harass Moab or contend with them, which contrasts with the acceptance of the notion of taking land in Judges 11:24.
Deuteronomy 2:9: And the LORD said unto me, Distress not the Moabites, neither contend with them in battle: for I will not give thee of their land [for] a possession; because I have given Ar unto the children of Lot [for] a possession. [Distress...: or, Use no hostility against Moab]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 2:19
This verse instructs not to disturb the Ammonites or take their land, which opposes the claim in Judges 11:24 of taking possession of land given by their god.
Deuteronomy 2:19: And [when] thou comest nigh over against the children of Ammon, distress them not, nor meddle with them: for I will not give thee of the land of the children of Ammon [any] possession; because I have given it unto the children of Lot [for] a possession.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:3
This verse commands the worship of only one God, whereas Judges 11:24 acknowledges the god of the Ammonites, potentially contradicting the idea of exclusive worship.
Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Contradiction with Isaiah 42:8
This verse asserts God’s refusal to share His glory with others, conflicting with the acknowledgment of other deities in Judges 11:24.
Isaiah 42:8: I [am] the LORD: that [is] my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 10:11
This verse declares that other gods shall perish, opposing the validity given to the god of the Ammonites in Judges 11:24.
Jeremiah 10:11: Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, [even] they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens.
Paradox #1
Judges 11:24 could be seen as conflicting with the idea that there is only one true God in some interpretations of Christianity. In this verse, there's a reference to God allowing a foreign tribe to have their own god, which might suggest a contradiction with the belief in the exclusivity and singularity of the God of Israel. This could be interpreted as inconsistent with the monotheistic principle that there is only one Almighty God.
Paradox #2
Historical contradictions regarding "Judges 11:24" can arise when comparing the territorial claims and divine rights expressed in this verse with other biblical accounts of land possession by different groups, such as Israelites and their neighbors. These passages may reflect different perspectives on land entitlement and divine will, leading to possible inconsistencies in understanding historical land ownership narratives within the biblical text.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in this verse is the concept of attributing land ownership to what a deity has given to different peoples. This can conflict with modern views on human rights and territorial disputes, as it suggests divine approval of taking land by conquest, which clashes with principles of fairness and peaceful coexistence.