Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse commands, "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts Jephthah's vow resulting in his daughter's death.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:31
This verse condemns human sacrifice, stating it is an abomination to the Lord.
Deuteronomy 12:31: Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. [to the: Heb. of the]
Contradiction with Leviticus 18:21
This verse prohibits offering children as sacrifices to Molech, suggesting that child sacrifice is against God's laws.
Leviticus 18:21: And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through [the fire] to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I [am] the LORD. [Molech: Gr. Moloch]
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:22
Emphasizes obedience over sacrifice, which contrasts with Jephthah's perceived need to fulfill his vow through sacrifice.
1 Samuel 15:22: And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams.
Paradox #1
The story around Judges 11:35 involves Jephthah making a vow to offer whatever came out of his house as a burnt offering to God in exchange for victory. The problem arises when it's his daughter who comes out first. This raises a conflict between the values of fulfilling vows and prohibitions against human sacrifice, which is considered wrong in other parts of the Bible. This inconsistency can lead to questions about the morality of Jephthah's actions and God's viewpoint on such vows.
Paradox #2
Judges 11:35 involves a character making a vow to God that leads to a morally troubling situation. The potential doctrinal conflict involves making vows that result in unethical actions. This can clash with teachings about God's justice and mercy, and with the commandment against doing harm. It raises questions about whether all vows must be fulfilled if they lead to wrongdoing.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency with Judges 11:35 could be related to the story of Jephthah's vow, which might be seen as conflicting with other Biblical teachings against human sacrifice. In other parts of the Bible, human sacrifice is clearly condemned, making Jephthah's situation and his subsequent actions a point of contention or moral conflict within the text.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this scenario arises from having to fulfill a vow that leads to a tragic and unintended outcome. It highlights a conflict between keeping one's promise to God and the moral dilemma of sacrificing a loved one. This raises questions about the ethics of making rash promises and the consequences they may bring.