Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse, "Thou shalt not kill," contradicts Judges 11:36, where Jephthah's daughter consents to being sacrificed.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Leviticus 18:21
This verse, "And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech," contradicts Judges 11:36 by prohibiting child sacrifice.
Leviticus 18:21: And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through [the fire] to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I [am] the LORD. [Molech: Gr. Moloch]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:31
This verse states, "Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods," which contradicts the act of fulfilling a vow that involves human sacrifice.
Deuteronomy 12:31: Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. [to the: Heb. of the]
Contradiction with Psalm 106:37-38
These verses, "Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood," describe sacrificing children as polluting and sinful, contradicting Judges 11:36.
Psalm 106:37-38: Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,
Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:31
This verse, "And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my heart," contradicts Judges 11:36 by highlighting that God did not command such acts of sacrifice.
Jeremiah 7:31: And they have built the high places of Tophet, which [is] in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded [them] not, neither came it into my heart. [came...: Heb. came it upon my heart]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 16:20-21
These verses, "Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter, That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?" contradict the approval of child sacrifice seen in Judges 11:36.
Ezekiel 16:20-21: Moreover thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. [Is this] of thy whoredoms a small matter, [to be...: Heb. to devour]
Contradiction with Micah 6:7
This verse, "Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?" questions and implies the absurdity and unacceptable nature of sacrificing one's child, contradicting Judges 11:36.
Micah 6:7: Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, [or] with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn [for] my transgression, the fruit of my body [for] the sin of my soul? [body: Heb. belly]
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction or inconsistency in Judges 11:36 arises from the issue of human sacrifice. The verse involves a vow that leads to the sacrifice of Jephthah's daughter. This can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that strongly condemn human sacrifice. The moral and ethical implications of fulfilling such a vow can create tension and raise questions about justice and obedience to God.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction in Judges 11:36 could relate to the issue of human sacrifice. Throughout the Bible, human sacrifice is generally condemned, as seen in other scriptures where God explicitly forbids it. However, this verse involves a situation where a vow leads to a human sacrifice, creating an apparent inconsistency with the broader biblical prohibition against such practices.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in the context of Judges 11:36 could relate to the story of Jephthah's vow. He makes a vow to sacrifice whatever comes out of his house to greet him if he returns victorious from battle. This is troubling because human sacrifices are generally inconsistent with other biblical teachings and Jewish law, which usually condemns such practices. This creates a conflict between the actions in the story and the broader principles found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #4
This verse deals with a promise that leads to a tragic outcome for someone innocent. The contradiction is that it portrays an obligation to fulfill a vow, even if it causes harm to someone. It raises questions about the morality of keeping promises that result in unnecessary suffering.