Contradictions and Paradoxes in Judges 12:6

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Judges 12:6 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Judges 12:6. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of Judges, when people couldn't say a certain word correctly, it showed they were from a different group, so they were stopped and not allowed to pass. This story teaches how important words and belonging to a group were back then.

Judges 12:6: Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce [it] right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

While Judges 12:6 involves killing based on dialect, this verse teaches to love and bless one's enemies.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with James 3:9-10

These verses emphasize blessing others and not cursing, even using the tongue, which contradicts the violent outcome of a speech test in Judges 12:6.

James 3:9-10: Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.

Contradiction with Romans 12:18

Encourages peace with all men, contrasting the conflict and violence depicted in Judges 12:6.

Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.

Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1

Advocates for a soft answer to turn away wrath, rather than responding with violence as in Judges 12:6.

Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.

Contradiction with Exodus 20:13

The commandment "Thou shalt not kill" stands against the slaying that occurs in Judges 12:6.

Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.

Paradox #1

The historical conflict in this context involves the pronunciation test used to identify people of a different group. This raises questions about how language differences appeared and whether such linguistic variances would be recognized uniformly across tribes in that period. Additionally, it is unlikely for a single word to consistently differentiate people across an entire region based on the historical and cultural understanding of the period.

Paradox #2

The contradiction in that verse could be seen in the focus on language or pronunciation as a reason for violence. It raises questions about justice and fairness, as punishing people based on their way of speaking rather than their actions or character can seem arbitrary and unjust.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.