Contradiction with Proverbs 26:4
This verse advises not to answer a fool according to his folly, which contrasts with the riddle-solving context of Judges 14:14, encouraging engagement with folly for resolution.
Proverbs 26:4: Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Contradiction with Proverbs 27:5
Open rebuke is considered better than secret love, opposing the secretive nature of the riddle in Judges 14:14.
Proverbs 27:5: Open rebuke [is] better than secret love.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:37
This verse advises simplicity and honesty in communication, contradicting the complexity and deceit within the riddle of Judges 14:14.
Matthew 5:37: But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Contradiction with 2 Timothy 2:23
Paul's advice to avoid foolish and unlearned questions contrasts with Samson's engagement in riddle games in Judges 14:14.
2 Timothy 2:23: But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:20
This admonition to avoid profane and vain babblings and contradictions opposes the nature of the riddle presented in Judges 14:14.
1 Timothy 6:20: O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [science: Gr. knowledge]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in Judges 14:14 could relate to the cultural context in which riddles were given and the activities surrounding it. The use of a riddle as a form of storytelling or a way to settle disputes may not align with other historical texts or traditions where communication and conflict resolution were handled differently in ancient times. Additionally, the specific details in the riddle about materials or events may not have a consistent historical basis outside the biblical narrative.
Paradox #2
Samson's riddle in Judges 14:14 involves taking something sweet out of something fierce, which can confuse readers about the morality of his actions. It may seem tricky because he uses a personal experience not easily understood by others, possibly hiding truth. This raises questions about fairness and honesty in his interaction.