Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Judges 14:15 involves coercion and threats, demanding a solution through fear, whereas Matthew 5:39 advocates for non-resistance and turning the other cheek instead of responding with aggression or threats.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
In Judges 14:15, the approach is one of revenge and intimidation for personal gain, while Romans 12:17 advises not to repay evil for evil, but to strive for honorable conduct.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
The coercion in Judges 14:15 is contrary to 1 Peter 3:9, which encourages not retaliating with insult but instead responding with blessing, doing the opposite of what is done to you.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Proverbs 17:9
The verse in Judges involves exploiting a relationship through betrayal, while Proverbs 17:9 values covering an offense and preserving friendship, not exploiting personal connections.
Proverbs 17:9: He that covereth a transgression seeketh love; but he that repeateth a matter separateth [very] friends. [seeketh: or, procureth]
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:31
Judges 14:15 is marked by bitterness and wrath, as seen in the threats, which contrasts with Ephesians 4:31 that instructs believers to put away all bitterness, wrath, and anger.
Ephesians 4:31: Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
Paradox #1
Judges 14:15 involves persuading someone to betray their loved one to get an answer, which can conflict with the moral value of loyalty to family or partners. It may show inconsistency in upholding honest and faithful relationships.