Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Judges 14:19 describes Samson killing thirty men, which contradicts the commandment "Thou shalt not kill."
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Judges 14:19 shows Samson taking vengeance himself, contrary to the principle of "Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord."
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Jesus teaches to "resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also," contrasting with Samson's violent response.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Advises against saying "I will recompense evil," which contradicts Samson's actions in Judges 14:19.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Contradiction with James 1:20
States "For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God," which contradicts Samson's actions motivated by anger.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in "Judges 14:19" could involve the portrayal of God's spirit enabling an act of violence, which might seem inconsistent with the broader biblical teachings advocating for peace and justice. The tension lies in understanding how divine empowerment for violent actions aligns with the moral and ethical teachings found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Judges 14:19 could relate to the depiction of God's spirit empowering someone to commit acts of violence or personal revenge, contrasting with the broader biblical teachings that emphasize peace, love, and forgiveness.
Paradox #3
One possible historical inconsistency in Judges 14:19 could be the mention of Samson traveling to Ashkelon, which was a city that belonged to the Philistines. Historically, it seems inconsistent that during a time of conflict with the Philistines, Samson would be able to travel there, carry out violent actions, and leave without immediate consequences. There are also questions about the logistics and feasibility of such a task, given the distance and the potential for retaliation.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Judges 14:19 might be seen in the use of violence and taking spoils from others. This action may conflict with other biblical teachings that promote peace, love, and respect for others' property, creating a potential inconsistency in the message on how to live morally.