Contradiction with James 1:13
This verse states that God does not tempt anyone, yet Judges 14:6 suggests divine empowerment in a situation related to Samson's desires.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This commandment instructs not to kill, while Judges 14:6 describes an act of violence empowered by divine intervention.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse teaches to turn the other cheek, contrasting the violent action of Samson in Judges 14:6.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
This verse describes God as a God of peace, while Judges 14:6 depicts a scenario involving strength and aggression.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:22-23
These verses list the fruits of the Spirit as love, joy, and peace, which contrasts with the aggressive act in Judges 14:6.
Galatians 5:22-23: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
Paradox #1
One possible theological inconsistency related to Judges 14:6 could be the portrayal of divine intervention for personal violence. In this verse, the Spirit of the Lord empowers Samson to kill a lion with his bare hands. Some might see a conflict between this act of violence being supported by divine power and the broader biblical teachings of peace and non-violence. This can raise questions about when and why God might intervene in such ways.
Paradox #2
One potential inconsistency is that Judges 14:6 describes a person performing an extraordinary feat of strength by tearing a lion apart with his bare hands. This might be seen as a contradiction with natural laws, as it is physically impossible for a human to overpower and tear apart a lion in this way. Additionally, within the cultural and historical context of ancient stories, this account could be seen as mythological or symbolic rather than a literal historical event, leading to differing interpretations. This might create conflict for those who read the text as literal history versus symbolic narrative.
Paradox #3
The verse describes a human performing a superhuman feat, which can conflict with scientific understanding of human physical capabilities. In science, a human cannot overpower a lion with bare hands due to the natural strength differences between a human and a large predator.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict in this verse might arise from the act of violence being empowered or justified by divine intervention. It can be seen as inconsistent because a divine force aids in a violent act, which contrasts with teachings that promote peace and non-violence. Some people might find it contradictory that spiritual strength is used for an action that seems aggressive or harmful.