Contradiction with Isaiah 40:29
This verse states that God gives power and strength to the weak, contrasting with Samson feeling powerless and fainting without water.
Isaiah 40:29: He giveth power to the faint; and to [them that have] no might he increaseth strength.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-32
These verses indicate that God knows our needs and cares for us, which contradicts Samson's desperation and questioning if God will provide for him in Judges 15:18.
Matthew 6:31-32: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This verse promises that God will supply every need, which contrasts with Samson’s doubt about being left to die of thirst.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Psalm 23:1
This verse suggests that the Lord is our shepherd and we lack nothing, conflicting with Samson's experience of lacking water.
Psalm 23:1: [A Psalm of David.] The LORD [is] my shepherd; I shall not want.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Judges 15:18 lies in the context of Samson's miraculous victories. Despite just defeating a large number of enemies with great strength, Samson suddenly complains of being extremely thirsty and fears dying of thirst, which seems inconsistent with the display of divine empowerment moments earlier. This raises questions about the continuity of divine support in different situations.
Paradox #2
The possible scientific inconsistency in Judges 15:18 lies in the miraculous nature of the event described. It suggests a supernatural intervention that doesn't align with scientific understanding, as it involves water coming out from a solid object (the jawbone Samson used) without any natural explanation. This contrasts with the laws of physics, as water cannot naturally flow from a bone.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Judges 15:18 could be seen in the expectation of divine intervention despite previous violent actions. On one hand, there is reliance on God for help in a moment of need, while on the other hand, there has been engagement in destructive actions. This could be seen as inconsistent because it mixes violence with seeking divine support, raising questions about the alignment of actions with faith.